MOVE 7 — THE REPO-OPEN CHECKLIST AND CLOCK (draft for the author)
Version: 0.2 · Status: FULFILLED — the door opened at Session 4k, ahead of the 2026-10-01 default. The author decided to share the closed build with whoever might carry it (the founding wager enacted), and the checklist was cleared before the flip: a full privacy/safety/security audit passed (do-no-harm, privacy, security posture, copyright — no blockers; the author’s privacy pass done — a private side-project name genericized, the home AV/VPN detail generalized); item 1 resolved by DE-SEALING the placebo/ablation material with a transparency note (studies/README.md) rather than escrowing it — full transparency over a spent blind; licensing, honesty surfaces, and the logs/OPEN_QUESTIONS.md front door all in place. The checklist below is preserved as the record of what had to be true. (Opening the repository was the author’s own act — the visibility flip performed by the author, not by the executor.)
Dated note (5 October 2026): the visibility flip itself happened later than the record above implies. The repository stayed private until the author had it made public on 5 October 2026 at 09:17 UTC. A pre-publication check of all 59 commits that day found no secrets, local paths or personal data beyond the author’s own name and commit address.
The clock (named default, per the ratified Fork 7: “opens by default if the window is missed”)
- Default-open date: 2026-10-01 (one quarter from this draft). The author may move it earlier or later on the record; a date moved silently or repeatedly without a logged reason is the ossification signal this clock exists to expose.
- Why the date matters doubly now: with the non-LLM appropriator deferred “to a future forker,” the opened repo is the only remaining road to a genuinely-foreign vantage — the thing every verdict’s cross-model-confirmed, not genuinely-foreign caveat is waiting for. Every quarter the repo stays shut, the project’s strongest claims stay n=1 of a kind (L-013).
The checklist (what must be true before opening)
- The blind survives the opening. The placebo/ablation verdicts must be collected BEFORE the repo opens — or the sealed files (
studies/placebo-control/SEALED_COMPANION.md, the arm key,studies/placebo-control/EMPTY_PROMPT_SEALED.md’s attestation, the sealed margins) must be moved to a private escrow — because an open repo publishes the arm key and un-blinds any coder who looks. This is the hard sequencing constraint the clock must respect: verdicts first, or escrow first. - The two-surfaces plan updates (
docs/THE_LIVING_DOCUMENT.md§7): the private contribution surface becomes public; CONTRIBUTING.md’s three contribution types (strengthen / break / propose-rival) and the “recruit for the fault line” criterion are already in place ✓. - Licensing ✓ (CC BY-SA 4.0 docs / MIT code —
LICENSE.md). - The honesty surfaces travel intact: the ledger honesty-notes, the plurality downgrade, DC-001…004, C-023’s delegation-cost — an opened repo that hid its self-doubts would falsify Theory C on day one.
- First-contributor path:
logs/OPEN_QUESTIONS.mdis the stated front door (“contributors start here”) — verify Q-001’s escrowed status is honestly described so the flagship question is offered, not hoarded. - The author’s own privacy pass (his call entirely): anything in logs/handoffs he considers personal.
What opening buys (the record’s own words)
The clean Theory-C baseline (Q-012), the genuinely-foreign grader (Q-016), real red-team volume (falsifier #4), the end of the “one standpoint” downgrade — every deferred vantage in the project converges on this door.
Author: Hulki Okan Tabak — with Claude · License: CC BY-SA 4.0.