S102 — Evaluating pronatalist policies with TFR brings misleading conclusions: examples from Hungary
Lutz, Sobotka, and Zeman / N-IUSSP (2024)
Open original source — www.niussp.org
Demographic analysis Fertility context
Curated public use: Use as fertility or preference context; it is not a direct test of the C5 intention-achievement pathway.
Limitation: Source cards are evidence anchors, not proof that a linked claim is settled.
Source note: Warns that period TFR changes can reflect birth timing and cohort composition, not necessarily lasting policy success.
Pinpoint locator: Not yet recorded in the current source schema.
Used by public records
- C5 evidence relationship E051 — context