The Reading Log

Dimension 15 · Type VII, Instrument (a tool a reader uses on their own read) · Build status: built · Panel score: not yet scored

Built 19 July 2026, the same day anchor A15 was discharged (catch C-27). Type VII: the instrument IS the register, and the whole of it. Self-contained per the author's ruling C-22 — no server, no account, no analytics, no network code of any kind; entries live in the reader's own browser on the reader's own device, and can be printed or saved by the reader as a file on their own disk. The project receives nothing, because there is nowhere for anything to go. Verified in a browser before publication: entries persist across reload, free text is escaped so a pasted script cannot run, and the file contains no network call.

The claim
The instrument that measured one reading can be published rather than kept, so that any first reader can keep the same kind of record of their own. Dimension 11 turned inside out: not the result, the apparatus.
The unit
the reading session — date, pages, where the reader stalled, what they wanted to ask, what unblocked them, and whether they stopped
What it shows
That the prompts of a difficulty log are an empirical question, not a theoretical one. These eight come from what one real accompanied first reading actually produced, not from a model of where a reader ought to struggle — and the ninth kind that reading produced is deliberately absent, because it was an artefact of dictation and does not generalise. The instrument states that exclusion in its own voice rather than quietly dropping it.

The artifact

Registers

The rule that built it

The inclusion rule
The instrument accepts "the reading session — date, pages, where the reader stalled, what they wanted to ask, what unblocked them, and whether they stopped"; tagged by eight of nine kinds: "Dimension 11 sorted 245 logged questions into nine kinds. Eight of them are offered here as tags." Stated in artifacts/reading-log/log.html (the What-to-record section — dimension 11's nine kinds, eight offered as tags, the ninth left out with its reason on the page; the session form below it; the unit field in this record). Cited by region, not line — the closing audit's own edits to this artifact shifted the line offsets that stood here (L-40)..
What was rejected under it
Kept, in the instrument's own voice: the ninth kind — "The ninth is left out deliberately. It was dictation and transcription noise... It is a fact about how that record was made, not about reading Ulysses... Its absence here is a decision, and this note is where it is recorded" (log.html; restated at data/dimensions.json, 381).
What kind of thing it claims
An INSTRUMENT, claiming nothing — under joint session 09's discriminating test (an inventory can only be attacked at its inclusion rule; a reading at its claim): Its own confidence field states it flatly: "The instrument makes no claim at all — it is a tool, not a finding, and it produces no data this project will ever see" (data/dimensions.json). The one judgement inside it — excluding the ninth kind — is published in the instrument where a reader can disagree with it.
Its declared parent
Dimension 11, the Difficulty Curve — declared: "Its prompts descend from dimension 11's taxonomy of difficulty" (data/dimensions.json); "Dimension 11, the Difficulty Curve, is the sole source" (same file); "Dimension 11 turned inside out" (same file); the artifact opens by saying so (log.html).

In the reading

Sources

Confidence

The instrument makes no claim at all — it is a tool, not a finding, and it produces no data this project will ever see. The one judgement inside it is the exclusion of the ninth kind (dictation and transcription noise) as specific to how the source record was made rather than to reading Ulysses; that judgement is stated in the instrument itself, where a reader can disagree with it.

All dimensions · by episode · the working document