Source and Case Linking Editorial Plan v1.6

Historical v1.6 editorial plan — retained for provenance. The current evidence layer uses data/evidence_edges.csv and data/source_publication.csv, including typed relations, canonical source identities, explicit evidence gaps, and failure/successful-repair/boundary roles. The stable Evidence route is the current public view.

Goal

The site should help readers move from thesis to claim, from claim to case, from case to source cluster, and from source cluster to objection.

Recommended public structure

1. Top Claims page.
2. Case Map page.
3. Source Clusters page.
4. Objections and Tests page.
5. Dashboard links to each.

Public source clusters

Use issue-area clusters rather than one long bibliography:

• systems theory and intellectual history;
• climate, ecology, and energy;
• reality, propaganda, synthetic media, and news;
• fertility, care, family, and reproductive agency;
• belief, meaning, spirituality, and social trust;
• technology, platforms, AI, and attention;
• governance, democracy, populism, and institutions;
• method, ethics, and public standards.

Case families

Current public case families:

• South Korea fertility and care;
• synthetic media/election provenance;
• climate misinformation and repair latency;
• comparative fertility;
• comparative synthetic media;
• climate sector repair latency.

Linking principle

Do not ask readers to trust the whole theory at once. Let them inspect one claim, one case, one objection, and one source cluster at a time.

Recommended page behavior

Each public claim should show:

• linked theory;
• linked case;
• source cluster;
• counterargument;
• falsifier;
• next test.

Each public case should show:

• what the case tests;
• which theory/module it supports or challenges;
• strongest rival explanation;
• what evidence is still missing.