Method commitment
M1 — The project must expose its own repair process
Uncommon Reality should show objections evidence gaps corrections revisions narrowing and withdrawals rather than only polished current wording.
- Historical id
- C10
- Fulfillment status
- partially_implemented
- Strongest challenge
- Transparency can become performance if objections never alter a claim.
- Audit test
- Can a reader identify what changed why it changed what evidence mattered how quickly correction occurred and whether a claim was narrowed challenged or retired?
- Break condition
- The project hides errors silently rewrites claims preserves claims despite failed tests or displays objections without revision consequences.
- Current anchors
- Public claim cards; objections and falsifiers; reader dashboard; v1.7.2 revision-log design.
- Evidence gap
- No sustained public correction history yet; the first revision log improves auditability but does not prove responsiveness over time.
- Misuse warning
- Good process is not evidence that a substantive claim is true.
- Next test
- Publish and maintain the v1.6 to v1.7 revision records and later record the first evidence-driven correction with timing and consequence.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-10
- Record version
- 1.7.2