Case Cards

Cases play different roles. Failure illustrations show where a proposed repair problem may exist. Successful-repair comparisons show that a bounded pressure trajectory changed under a specified regime. Boundary cases show where the theory should narrow, where a rival may explain more, or where slow recovery should not be mistaken for continuing repair failure. No case is proof by itself.

3 failure illustrationsCS001, CS002, and CS003 expose bounded candidate problems without establishing the proposed causal mechanism.
1 successful repairCS004 separates institutional control and pressure reversal from incomplete substrate recovery.
1 boundary caseCS005 tests where slow physical recovery should narrow an institutional-failure interpretation.

bounded illustration

South Korea fertility

Illustrates reproductive-agency and care constraints in one setting; does not establish a general causal mechanism.

Open case

bounded illustration

New Hampshire AI robocall

Documents a synthetic-media event and governance response; illustrates provenance and response-timing questions without establishing incremental verification cost or behavioral effect.

Open case

bounded illustration

Climate misinformation and repair latency

Illustrates a climate misinformation and delay problem; does not establish Repair-Lag causality or the independent effect of misinformation.

Open case

successful repair

Vienna–Montreal ozone regime

Substantial adaptive successful repair at the institutional-control and pressure-reversal levels; full total-column ozone recovery remains conditional and incomplete.

Open case

boundary

North American acid-deposition control and uneven monitored surface-water chemistry recovery

Boundary case: institutional control and pressure reduction succeeded faster than regionally uneven monitored surface-water chemistry recovery; biological recovery remains undefined and residual damage cannot automatically be coded as continuing institutional repair failure.

Open case